|
Swapo leads the nation into poverty, hunger and crime |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, 16 August 2007 13:26 |
|
Dear Editor, AS a concerned citizen, I wound like to express my views about the message of former president Sam Nujoma as published in The Namibian of July 30. Nujoma was quoted as saying that “…all Namibians should support the ruling party Swapo so that it can always win elections, as it is the only political organization that can improve the living standards of all Namibians”. Since when has Swapo managed to do that? We are sick and tired of listening to Nujoma’s lies and empty promises. I always think that if it was not Swapo ruling under Nujoma, then our country would not look like this. Let me start with water, a basic need. Namibia citizens are crying out all over the country because water has become an unaffordable basic commodity. If I remember right, during colonial times we were not having such problem. Swapo has failed on this one. The second is food: The Swapo-led government was accused of giving rotten drought aid to some citizens. The minority groups like the San and Himba, are suffering under the Swapo-led government, they have nothing to eat and no proper education. Is that the improvement of living standard of our people? Look at schools. Under the Swapo government there is a ‘slogan’ that says “Education for All” that I do not want to hear anymore. The children of the poor are not allowed to repeat Grade 10 or 12 if they happen to fail. Now the streets are just full of young people who have failed the said grades. The education system is just becoming worse in Namibia. Pupils are failing and there are no proper feeding programmes in secondary schools. It is interesting to note that the top government officials take their kids to private schools. Look at the state hospitals and clinics. There is a lack of proper medication, no proper treatment. In fact there has been no improvement in the government’s health sector in Namibia for seventeen years. It has just become worse. Unemployment under the Swapo-led government in Namibia is very high. The crime-rate under the Swapo-led government is just increasing in Namibia. You cannot walk around freely anymore. Abuse, misuse and mismanagement of government property are very, very high in this country. They are building a new State House for hundred of millions so that they can stay in a luxury mansion while people are suffering. They are always told “the government does not have money”. State hospitals are falling down without repair. Government schools are failing to produce the requirement outcome. Government infrastructure is on the verge of collapse without repair. Government cars are misused and broken without repair. What is happening to the government tenders approved on yearly basis for Ministry of Works? The Swapo-led government did nothing to improve the living standards of its citizens. We are sick and tired! Concerned citizen Asteria
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 16 August 2007 13:27 |
|
|
Just give us diamond trading licenses and concessions |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, 16 August 2007 13:26 |
|
Dear Editor I WOULD like to know if you would do an article about the sensitive issue of diamond trading licenses that are not being issued as well as diamond mining concessions that are only given to certain directors, government officials or members of parliament. I have been mandated by a group in the Democratic Republic of Congo to sell rough diamonds on their behalf and can provide the legal document to show it. I have traveled to the DRC and have established a solid supply of rough Kimberly Process Certified (KPC) diamonds. I have found that it is easier to export diamonds from the DRC than from our own country. We ordinary Namibians are not given the opportunity to explore our natural resources. The Government is making it very difficult for us ordinary Namibians to do explorations. But I am busy helping a South African investor to obtain diamond concessions in the DRC. Why can’t our government assist us in obtaining concessions and licenses here in our own country and by this we can bring in more revenue and create jobs. Many government officials have rich diamond concessions that they are not developing. Why should they be allowed to waste opportunities for growth like that? I would like to be heard and to make the government aware of the fact that there is a lot of potential for Namibians like myself to help build the country and the nation. They should issue more diamond licenses and concessions to us. We have the resources and the knowledge to develop these concessions and bring revenue to Namibia, making a difference in the economic growth of our country. Namibia is known to have the best quality diamonds in the world and it should be used to create a solid economic platform for our country and its people. It can still be controlled by the government, but they should make more licenses and concessions available. Almost every week you read in the papers how Namibians are caught in foreign countries trying to sell diamonds without licenses and being arrested for that. It is the government giving them no choice - that is why they do it. Imagine if we could explore those concessions; increase the production by at least 10% - how much revenue can be brought to our beautiful country. I thus wish to make the Government aware that we are flocking to other countries and helping them boost their country’s economy by bringing in revenue to those countries. I want my voice to be heard and I want the Government to think outside of the box. Companies like De-Beers make billions of dollars from our precious natural resources and the money is not being brought back to Namibia. I want to play a role in the economic development of our country and believe Namibia can be one of the richest countries in the world. Help us build our country and help us make Namibia one of the richest African countries in Africa. At the moment Antwerp in Belgium is the diamond capital of the world. Why not make Windhoek the diamond capital of Africa, attracting all these millionaires to visit our beautiful country and investing their millions and billions here rather than in Europe. B.J.Heyns P.O.Box 21785 Windhoek 7 August 2007 |
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 16 August 2007 13:27 |
|
Leave the hospitality industry to private sector |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, 16 August 2007 13:25 |
|
Dear Editor, I READ in your newspaper of 19 July about alleged favoritism in the appointment of the new Namibia Tourism Board CEO. I also noted that the board of the same institution would prefer continuity as their main criterion and, indeed, if this was the reason, why even bother to advertise the position instead of simply promoting the people already on the board. The same article states that the NTB registers all tourism establishments and carries out inspections to ensure that they comply with the required standards. But the NTB in Namibia should also focus on selling the beauty of our primary touristic destinations - be it domestic or abroad. Tourism is leisure, recreation and travel and I think our tourism sector should focus on what kind of leisure and recreation our touristic destinations offer to our visitors. Successful tourism development involves fulfilling visitor expectations as well as attracting them to a destination. It must be borne in mind that basically tourism is actually in fact selling the beautiful scenery of our country. This means the preservation and conservation of these attributes cannot be over-emphasized. In this regard we cannot just appoint anyone to head this important institution without him having an appreciation of such things as the environmental carrying capacity, limits of acceptable change, social carrying capacity, cost benefit analysis and an understanding of the relationship between the conservation of biological diversity and Tourism in Namibia. It is also not clear to me whether we understand the role of privately-owned lands used for tourism and conservation. If that is so, why do we as a Government spend so much money building accommodation in Sossusvlei instead of using that money towards conservation in Etosha or Khaudom, etc. What this means is that we do not have a clear policy with respect to Government versus private enterprise interventions. The government should spend money on those activities that are considered vital to conservation and protection while the private sector should be encouraged to expand the hospitality industry. I mean take for instance Khaudom National Park. There is no need for Government to spend money to put up accommodation facilities inside the park; instead the private sector could be supported to put up lodges outside the park on the adjacent land surrounding the park. That way the park would be free of any settlement and the Government would concentrate on conservation while earning money through park fees and entrance fees from tourists visiting the park. The protected landscape or seascape (IUCN category V) provides a clear and legitimate alternative to a national park (IUCN cat II) in areas where the presence and the impact of resident populations and private ownership rule out a national park cat. II, or where it is the very harmony of people and nature which makes for an environment of quality and distinctiveness. The protected landscape provides huge potential to develop tourism further in our country.
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 16 August 2007 13:27 |
|
|
Hungry Caprivi college students furious |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, 16 August 2007 13:24 |
|
Dear Editor, I AM a student at the Caprivi College of Education and it’s facing a lot of problems since the rector, John Nyambe Kamwi, left the college last term. Everything is just falling apart, students are starving and there is no contingency fund for students. This is very painful for us since our 3rd year students are struggling to buy stationary from their own pocket-money while they still have unused money in their college account. Sometimes students do not get breakfast. On August 10, it was break-time and we all went to the dining hall where, to my disappointment, I saw some students eating bread while others were leaving since there was not enough bread. That day at lunch we ate four slices and drank Oros, and at supper it was three slices and a very small polony. During the time of the former rector, we still faced minor problems, but he quickly solved them. We salute Nyambe Kamwi where-ever he is. So, now tell me, are theses problems caused by the fact that we don’t have a rector or what? On August 10 a meeting was called by the Dean of Students and the Control Officer (CO) but no conclusion was reached - instead it ended up in chaos. Political and threatening words were being used by the CO against students. After the meeting, food which was supposed to be given to us by the cooks was given to us by the SRC. When we asked why, we were told it was the cooks demonstrating because the Dean of Students accused them of taking food for themselves instead of giving it to the students. We students of Caprivi College of Education are tired of acting rectors. Viva Caprivi College of Education Viva!! Concerned student, Caprivi College of Education |
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 16 August 2007 13:27 |
|
What sort of promotion is that? |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, 16 August 2007 13:23 |
|
Dear Editor, I HAVE serious concerns about the promotion of teachers in the Endola Circuit. The concern is that promotion posts are given to inefficient, irrelevant people, while efficient and relevant people are ignored and not even invited for an interview. Teachers who obtained qualifications full-time are not taken seriously in the Endola Circuit, but posts are given to people who obtained qualifications through in-service training with lots of work and assistance from colleagues. Here are some examples: a promotion post was advertised, a teacher with category D obtained and having a B. Ed. Full-time from UNAM plus a B. Ed. Hons. from North Western University applied but unfortunately she was not selected. The post was instead given to a teacher with a B. ETD gained part-time after one year only. I would like the Director of Education or the chairperson of the committee responsible for selection to give me feedback on how they choose people - especially in the Endola Circuit. In some cases a person can be invited for an interview at more than one school but in different subjects. What qualifications do these people posses that make the choices? This is a message to the director that this practice contributes to poor results at the and of the academic year. Because we ordinary teachers are tired of performing managerial tasks as many appointed ones are useless. Please, I want the director or the Endola inspector to respond and give me answer on this issue. Concerned teacher Endola Circuit 0812951906 |
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 16 August 2007 13:27 |
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 279 of 312 |