|
Monday, 25 June 2007 11:22 |
|
Namibian, Windhoek ECB whistleblower sets record straight Dear Editor, I FEEL obliged to respond on the article carried by Informanté on 14 June 2007 under the heading ‘ECB chief fires whistleblower”, in order to put facts in the right perspective. I am the fired Electricity Control Board (ECB) accountant. It is true that I went to the Minister. That seemed to have been the only platform available at the time. One time earlier, when I could not agree with Mr Simasiku, I asked him if I could have audience with the Board to explain my side of the story. Mr Simasiku told me that there was no such a procedure in the staff policy, which was also true. It is implied in the article that I was fired for having told the Minister about Mr Simasiku’s trail of illegal activities but why is he not saying so? Why is he hiding behind a retrenchment? Only cowards do that. I did not and have not been receiving any salary as reported. I want to add and emphasise however that Mr Simasiku is sustained by the company debit card that is linked to the only company bank account as he has decided to defy the recommendations of the auditors against the use of it, because it defies the norm of having two signatories authoring any deduction as per policy. It is doubtful if the Board of directors has gone contrary to the auditors’ recommendations and in fact ratified the use of such debit card. I believe the card is used for personal use. It was interesting to note Mr Simasiku’s comment to Informanté that he borrows instead of stealing. A noble stance in deed. His stealing definition is however inconsistent with the dictionary meaning. Why would the Board make him pay back money lent to him ordinarily other than allowing the normal lending process to run its course? Mr. A. Hangula |
|
Last Updated on Monday, 25 June 2007 11:23 |
|
Answers needed on Ondangwa Trade Fair company |
|
|
|
|
Monday, 25 June 2007 11:21 |
|
Dear Editor, What seems to have been an attempt by the former Mayor of Ondangwa, Prisscila Kauna Nashandi, to clarify the Ondangwa Trade Fair cc, has brought many questions to mind. Did she knowingly abuse her position to personally benefit from the Ondangwa Town Council? Is she admitting that she is incompetent, ignorant or professionally corrupt? How many husbands of the shareholders were having stands at the 2006 Trade Fair? Why was the trade fair preparation for 2007 put on hold if there is nothing sinister? During the week of June 11-15, Nashandi used the print media to comment on, among others, as follow: “The Ondangwa Trade Fair cc is a private business entity”. Why did the shareholders, who are business literate, not know about it? Nashandi’s reaction is mostly referred to the shareholders who are aggrieved and some have since resigned. If it is a private venture who is the owner now? “This is what happened: I signed on the dotted line of the registration form, in my capacity then, as a mayor, for my Town Council’s shares. I left the filling-in of the rest of the form to my official… one day, my deputy called me into his office. He told me that rumour is that Ondangwa Trade Fair cc is 55% mine … He showed me the form where it indeed appeared as such. I discovered that the official who completed the form had filled-in the space- “Priskilla Nashandi”, instead of “Priskilla Nashandi representing Ondangwa Town Council”. I do not know who this official is …” What does the then Mayor know? At that time, what was supposed to be her and her husband’s shares? How many blank forms and cheques has she signed as a Mayor? I believe she must have known that “that” form is meant for “individual completion” otherwise there would have been the jumbled up names. For Mrs Nashandi to represent a town in a “private business” while she is a Mayor qualifies her for a conflict of interest which is corruption. “It is true that the Dogg’s quote was higher than others. Coca-cola graciously agreed to sponsor the event and among the quotations at hand, accepted the Dogg’s – the higher quotation…” Were you (Mrs Nashandi) not surprised or have you not become suspicious of a questionable deal that “smells” favouritism? Coca-cola must come clean, publicly, on this one. The criteria must be exposed for the public scrutiny. “We” know some of the Coca-cola managers! “The Trade Fair has a cheque account. Each cheque requires at least two signatures. No cheques of such amount (N$250 000) went through the account. Further, the takings from the gate, registration fee or from any other source/event had people appointed as responsible personal of them from the Finance Department of the Ondangwa Town Council…” Is this an admission that the Town Council resources were used on private business? Can the Anti-corruption Commission (ACC) step in? Disgruntled resident, Ondangwa |
|
Last Updated on Monday, 25 June 2007 11:23 |
|
|
Roads Authority corruption against the poor |
|
|
|
|
Friday, 15 June 2007 11:54 |
|
Dear Editor, A HUGE cloud of sadness and despair hangs over the heads of tenders, when things are done the way they are not supposed to be. We have heard that the Roads Authority (RA), is involved in a court case with RCC (Roads Contractor Company), which is in favor of RCC getting all the tenders from RA. The RA, during its previous meetings over tenders have made it clear they would try to uplift the standards of previously disadvantaged groups, which has not happened. Tenders given out by the Roads Authority, so called open tender fishing, cost around N$300. Although the previously disadvantaged groups want to tender it is a financial burden for us to struggle to get the N$300. Again we have to travel to attend pre-tender meetings to be marked present, otherwise your tender document will not be considered. Before the closing date we have to travel far distances to Windhoek to hand in the tender documents. All in all the whole process costs us around N$1000 or more . The Roads Authority is therefore playing a tricky game of giving out tenders throughout the country just as a money making business. My question is why does the Roads Authority give out tenders if they are aware of the fact that it will be awarded to RCC? Roads Authority must therefore pay back the money we wasted on buying tender documents in previous years. I was informed by one of the tender board members that the Roads Authority does not have money to give out tenders to different bidders, other than RCC. This is not true. If one looks at the tender bulletin, the total amount of money tendered by RCC in comparison to others, leaves a huge difference. Why should RA give RCC high priced tenders if they do not have money? We would be very happy if the Government looked into this mismanagement at the RA. Is this poverty reduction? RCC is an independent company that has been functioning for many years. Let’s be honest towards ourselves and the country at large to fight against poverty and joblessness. Thanks, Your Concerned Tenderer |
|
Last Updated on Friday, 15 June 2007 11:55 |
|
Friday, 15 June 2007 11:54 |
|
Dear Editor, ALLOW me to express a few comments in your paper to inform the general public about the pricing irregularities that I encountered at Trade Centre, Windhoek. I do not like to my express my complaints in the press, but after informing Trade Centre management of their wrong pricing on numerous items, they still did not correct it. A month ago I purchased 22 items of which 7 were not priced the same as on the shelves all higher. I brought this to the attention of Mr Hennie Van Wyk, the General Merchandise Manager. All these items were between 3-5 percent more expensive. He assured me that this problem would be solved immediately and that it was a mistake from their side. On Saturday June 2, I went to buy dog food (Family Favorite 8kg) that was on a special of N$29.99/bag, but I was amazed that it was still N$30.89 - the same as a month ago. The cashier informed me that they had received numerous complaints about pricing that was wrong. She also told me that clients get refunds if they complain but in most cases clients do not pick up the wrong pricing and nothing is being done to correct these prices on the shelves. Sir, if you can steal two percent on everybody’s shopping trolley, you must make a handy illegal profit. It is fraud, because you are aware of it and you continue ripping your clients off.Is there not a “Consumer Watch” in Namibia that can take legal steps against this unlawfulness? I have still got my old tax invoices, you were informed of the irregularities. Regards, AD Schoemann
|
|